Agriculture
Springing forward
Keeping Bugs Away from Food
Treating peanut allergy bit by bit
Amphibians
Newts
Bullfrogs
Tree Frogs
Animals
Cacophony Acoustics
Deep Krill
Fishy Sounds
Behavior
From dipping to fishing
Memory by Hypnosis
Double take
Birds
Crows
Geese
Condors
Chemistry and Materials
Mother-of-Pearl on Ice
A Butterfly's Electric Glow
Butterfly Wings and Waterproof Coats
Computers
A Light Delay
Graphene's superstrength
Play for Science
Dinosaurs and Fossils
Big Fish in Ancient Waters
Battling Mastodons
Message in a dinosaur's teeth
E Learning Jamaica
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Earth
Riding to Earth's Core
Earth's Poles in Peril
Sky Dust Keeps Falling on Your Head
Environment
Spotty Survival
An Ocean View's Downside
The Best Defense Is a Good Snow Fence
Finding the Past
Fakes in the museum
Untangling Human Origins
Preserving Ancient Warrior Paint
Fish
Halibut
Swordfish
Marlin
Food and Nutrition
Strong Bones for Life
Allergies: From Bee Stings to Peanuts
Recipe for Health
GSAT English Rules
Subject and Verb Agreement
Who vs. That vs. Which
Order of Adjectives
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
GSAT Practice Papers | GSAT Mathematics | Maths
March 21-22, 2013: Over 43,000 students will take the GSAT Exam
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
GSAT Exam Preparation
GSAT Mathematics
Math is a real brain bender
Math of the World
42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
Human Body
A Long Haul
Cell Phones and Possible Health Hazards
What the appendix is good for
Invertebrates
Squid
Invertebrates
Corals
Mammals
Miscellaneous Mammals
Wolverines
Sheep
Parents
Children and Media
Choosing a Preschool: What to Consider
The Surprising Meaning and Benefits of Nursery Rhymes
Physics
Einstein's Skateboard
The Particle Zoo
Thinner Air, Less Splatter
Plants
Hungry bug seeks hot meal
Seeds of the Future
When Fungi and Algae Marry
Reptiles
Geckos
Boa Constrictors
Copperhead Snakes
Space and Astronomy
Wrong-way planets do gymnastics
Icy Red Planet
Witnessing a Rare Venus Eclipse
Technology and Engineering
Sugar Power for Cell Phones
A Light Delay
Toy Challenge
The Parts of Speech
Pronouns
Adjectives and Adverbs
Problems with Prepositions
Transportation
Revving Up Green Machines
Troubles with Hubble
Seen on the Science Fair Scene
Weather
Recipe for a Hurricane
Watering the Air
Where rivers run uphill
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution








Designed and Powered by HBJamaica.com™